From The Washington Post.

From The New York Times.

Slate: Alito more conservative than Scalia.

You didn’t think we lived in a democracy, did you?

Here is a press release by ElectionArchive.org on fraud during the 2004 elections. If this is correct, fraud in Ohio gave Bush the election, thereby causing, among other things, further troops to die, natural disasters to be mismanaged, and conservative justices to be given lifetime appointments. The American people deserve a full investigation.

Release: November 2, 2005 The National Election Data Archive (NEDA)

The Gun is Smoking: Ohio Exit Poll Data Provides Virtually Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount

Summary: New analysis of the precinct-level Ohio exit poll data provides virtually irrefutable evidence of large scale vote miscounts in Ohio during the 2004 presidential election. 6% of Ohio’s exit-polled precincts had impossible vote counts and 57% had significant discrepancies (with less than 5% chance of occurring in any one precinct). The pattern of Ohio’s exit poll results is not consistent with any exit poll error hypothesis. However, it is consistent with pro-Bush vote miscounts.

NEDA’s full paper ‘The Gun is Smoking: Ohio Precinct-level Exit Poll Data Show Virtually Irrefutable Evidence of Vote Miscount’ is available at http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/OH/Ohio-Exit-Polls-2004.pdf

In two Ohio precincts, even if all voters who did not complete exit polls had voted for Bush, the total Bush vote count would have been less than the official count. In a third precinct, all voters who did not complete exit polls would have had to vote for Bush to equal the official count. Unless Bush voters lied much more than Kerry voters on exit polls, or massive exit poll error occurred that was not detected by the pollsters, the results are mathematically impossible.

The Ohio exit poll data are a smoking gun for vote miscounts in Ohio. Ohio exit poll results are consistent with earlier findings of similar unexplained and implausible exit poll discrepancies in the national exit poll sample as described in the January 19, 2005 Edison/Mitofsky report.

The Boston Globe:

As a senior at Princeton University, Samuel A. Alito Jr. chaired an undergraduate task force that recommended the decriminalization of sodomy, accused the CIA and the FBI of invading the privacy of citizens, and said discrimination against gays in hiring ”should be forbidden.”

From the AP:

In college, Samuel Alito led a student conference that urged legalization of sodomy and curbs on domestic intelligence, a sweeping defense of privacy rights he said were under threat by the government and the dawning computer age….

Three decades before the Supreme Court decriminalized gay sex, Alito declared on behalf of his group of fellow Princeton students that “no private sexual act between consenting adults should be forbidden.” Alito also called for an end to discrimination against homosexuals in hiring.

Read the original report at Campus Progress.

So, the question now is: does he still support the opinions he wrote in college?

“By 46 percent to 15 percent, Americans say the level of honesty and ethics in the government has declined rather than risen under Bush.”