Memory upgrade

When I ordered the laptop, Sony was charging an exorbitant amount to get the maximum possible 2GB of memory–something like $1000, I believe. I decided to get the minimum amount of memory that would work with my nVidia video card (512 MB), and later upgrade.

I decided that this weekend would be a good time to order the extra memory. Unfortunately, none of the Sony documentation (not what came on the Windows installation, not what’s available online) detailed the memory specs. I emailed customer support; they told me to call. I called, and the person at the other end could not find the information either. However, he referred me to www.crucial.com, where you can search for and order the memory that is compatible with your system. It turns out that the S580 takes a 200-pin SODIMM. I’m not up on what additional numbers are needed to specify the memory, or what the compatibility issues are, so I wound up ordering from them. They seem to be only slighlty more expensive (assuming I’m comparing the right products) than TigerDirect, where I’ve usually done my online computer shopping.

Installing the extra memory will be an adventure, I’m sure. I’ve never taken apart a laptop.

Let’s talk about sex

Sex is fun, but as we all know, it has potential consequences: it can give rise to strong emotions, expose one to STDs, and (for straight folks) carry the possibility of an unintended pregnancy. For this reason, there is general agreement that people are socially and economically better off holding off on sex until adulthood. Even the modern adult, however, is hardly constrained by older notions of “procreative sex only, and only in marriage.” Some choose to hold off on marriage until reaching a more secure and stable point in their lives. Others do not wish to get married, or are not allowed to. Even a married straight couple may choose to limit how many children they have. This does not change the fact that most adults are sexual creatures, and sex can be extremely gratifying.

Which brings us to the Sex Wars. Many conservatives want to establish abstinence-only sex education, reasoning that it will cut down on pre-marital sex and the myriad social problems they claim it brings about: the decay of morals, rampant hedonism, and teenage pregnancy. Many conservatives also want to restrict or criminalize abortion, in part because they see it as breaking the link between sex and procreation. For this reason, too, many conservatives are waging a war on contraception, so that every sexual act (remember, only the straight missionary position is allowed) may lead to pregnancy and the growth of the family.

These solutions put the cart before the horse. Sure, youngsters should wait to have sex, but human nature hasn’t changed in millenia: just as they did in Biblical, medieval, and Victorian times, some fraction of young people will have sex (sometimes covertly, sometimes with a wink from society). Admonitions to abstain have not worked in all that time, and they don’t work now. Given that fact, what is the best we can do? Surely it is to educate people so that the undesirable consequences are reduced as much as possible! This means comprehensive sex education, including information on contraceptives and their risks and benefits. Withholding this information, knowing human nature as we do, is tantamount to cruelly keeping our children ignorant and condemning them to carry the burden of their uninformed, if less than wise, choices.

A similar reasoning applies to abortion. Getting an abortion is no walk in the park, and I doubt many women rely on it as a means of birth control. More to the point, women have abortions even when abortions are criminalized: the rich do it with the discretion that only money can buy, while the poor do it in back alleys. Criminalizing abortion will not stop it, but will drive it underground. The results, at least for the poor, will be a higher rate of health complications and deaths, as well as the additional stigma, vulnerability to extortion, and criminal record that can dash all aspirations of building a better life.

If the conservatives really care about making lives better and not having abortions, they should make it possible for people to be informed about sex, prophylactics, and birth control, so that those who invariably can’t or do not want to live up to conservatives’ moral codes can make informed decisions. In other words, given that some people will choose to have sex in situations that put them at risk of STDs or unwanted pregnancies, our social policy should be to help them and society minimize those risks and associated costs. For this reason, the third front in the sex wars is also important: access to contraceptives must be guaranteed. This way, we can help reduce disease and unwanted pregnancy before they happen, when it’s cheaper and safer.

What seems to drive many of the conservatives in the Sex Wars is the notion that sex and reproduction ought to always remain coupled. That is a moral judgment to which they are entitled, but which should not be forced on the rest of society. I submit for their consideration a different tenet which works for other people: when done in a way that is respectful of all parties and which prevents unwanted consequences, sex is not only harmless, it is a celebration of life.

From sea to shining sea

Living life differently than the expectations you’ve slowly settled down into over the years sometimes makes the best sense, but often feels like swimming against the current. If that’s where life takes you and what you are called to do, though, then there’s no helping it: you just hunker down and do it. What a pleasant surprise it is, then, to find that you are not alone, that there are others who are making similar unobtrusive choices and have paved the way before you. Many an obscure bend in the road turns out to be well traveled: coming out, bike commuting, …. or a dual-residence relationship.

Knox and I are currently doing the bi-coastal thing. He’s working mostly in Seattle at the moment, and I am in Boston. We can each advance our careers and enjoy the non-couple parts of our lives, and we get to travel between two fascinating cities (or meet somewhere in between). At the same time, we juggle how best to optimize our time together: holidays, vacations, and the minutiae of everyday life.

It turns out that we are certainly not alone in these choices. The New York Times alone had two articles on the topic this week: one on “living alone together” and one on couples who maintain two regular homes because of work. The local boookstore carries The Long-Distance Relationship Guide. And our friend Pam has a trans-Atlantic marriage that has her summering in Seattle and wintering in Austria.

So far, we’re handling things well and the experience is proving instructive. Knox is getting ready to leave for Seattle in a few days, and I am looking forward to visiting him there in early June. He’s met my friends here and explored the area; now it will be my turn to get to know his friends better and get acquainted with the much-vaunted Pacific Northwest.

Right now, though, we’re enjoying a lazy morning reading the paper at a local cafe before walking, biking, and dining in one of our cities.